Advance-care-planning and end-of-life discussions in the perioperative period: a review of healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and training

Open ArchivePublished:August 08, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.075

      Abstract

      Whilst the risk of dying after an operation in the UK is very small, the volume of surgery means that there are 20 000–25 000 deaths each year. For these patients and others who suffer major complications, critical illness often leads to a loss of capacity. If wishes are not discussed in advance, the patients may be excluded from meaningful involvement in decisions affecting their care. The preoperative period has been postulated as one where advance care planning could begin by engaging in voluntary conversations about an individual's wishes, priorities, and values should he/she loses capacity. There remain unanswered questions as to whether healthcare professionals are supportive of a move towards better engagement in such discussions with patients. Even if the reception to the idea is positive, it is clear that appropriate training and understanding will be required. The aims of this review were to describe the current knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards advance care planning in the perioperative setting, and to outline any educational programmes or training limitations that have been identified. Seven articles that met the inclusion criteria were identified. They indicate that healthcare professionals mostly have a positive view of advance care planning in the perioperative period, and there is little training or educational content available. Despite this, most healthcare professionals report feeling well equipped to have such discussions. Evidence was not found of advance care planning becoming a routine part of training or practice in the care of patients in the lead up to high-risk surgery.

      Keywords

      References

        • Choosing Wisely UK
        Choosing Wisely UK [Internet].
        2017 (Available from:)
        • Royal College of Anaesthetists
        Perioperative medicine: the pathway to better surgical care.
        Royal College of Anaesthetists, London2015
        • NHS End of Life Care Programme
        Advance care planning: a guide for health and social care staff.
        Department of Health, London2008
        • General Medical Council
        Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making.
        General Medical Council, 2010: 1-85
        • Dixon J.
        • King D.
        • Knapp M.
        Advance care planning in England: is there an association with place of death? Secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of Bereaved People.
        BMJ Support Palliat Care. 16 June 2016; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000971
        • Sabatino C.P.
        The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy.
        Milbank Q. 2010; 88: 211-239
        • Paduano M.
        Payout after woman was kept alive against her will [Internet].
        BBC, 2017 ([cited 2018 Apr 18]. Available from:)
        • Aw D.
        • Hayhoe B.
        • Smajdor A.
        • Bowker L.K.
        • Conroy S.P.
        • Myint P.K.
        Advance care planning and the older patient.
        QJM. 2012; 105: 225-230
        • Seymour J.
        Capacity, care planning and advance care planning in life limiting illness: a guide for health and social care Staff.
        National End of Life Care Programme, Leicester2011
        • Buswell J.
        • Conroy S.
        • Liddle J.
        • et al.
        Advance care planning. Concise guidance to good practice.
        2009
        • Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A.
        • Rietjens J.A.
        • van Der Heide A.
        The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: asystematic review.
        Palliat Med. 2014; 28: 1000-1025
        • Pearse R.M.
        • Harrison D.A.
        • James P.
        • et al.
        Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom.
        Crit Care. 2006; 10: R81
        • Story D.A.
        • Leslie K.
        • Myles P.S.
        • et al.
        Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.
        Anaesthesia. 2010; 65: 1022-1030
        • Office for National Statistics
        Population ageing in the United Kingdom, its constituent countries and the European union.
        in: Report that gives an overview of population ageing in the UK, its constituent countries and the European Union, London. 2012: 1-12
        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia.
        Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra2006
        • Fuchs V.R.
        Health care for the elderly: how much? Who will pay for it?.
        Health Aff. 1999; 18: 19-21
        • Blackwood D.
        • Santhirapala R.
        • Mythen M.
        • Walker D.
        End of life decision planning in the perioperative setting: the elephant in the room?.
        Br J Anaesth. 2015; 115: 648-650
        • Moher D.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Clarke M.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
        Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1; 4https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
        • Robinson K.A.
        • Saldanha I.J.
        • McKoy N.A.
        Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1325-1330
        • Pace R.
        • Pluye P.
        • Bartlett G.
        • et al.
        Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49: 47-53
        • Pluye P.
        • Gagnon M.P.
        • Griffiths F.
        • Johnson-Lafleur J.
        A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 46: 529-546
        • Souto R.Q.
        • Khanassov V.
        • Hong Q.N.
        • Bush P.L.
        • Vedel I.
        • Pluye P.
        Systematic mixed studies reviews: updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52: 500-501
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
        • Amini A.
        • Miura J.T.
        • Larrieux G.
        • et al.
        Palliative care training in surgical oncology and hepatobiliary fellowships: a national survey of the fellows.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 1761-1767
        • Ayres E.
        • Adelman R.
        • Eachempati S.
        • Reid M.C.
        A palliative care education needs assessment survey in surgical residents.
        in: American geriatrics society 2015 annual scientific meeting. American Geriatric Society based in New York, Washington2015: S47
        • Bradley C.T.
        • Brasel K.J.
        • Schwarze M.L.
        Physician attitudes regarding advance directives for high-risk surgical patients: a qualitative analysis.
        Surgery. 2010; 148: 209-216
        • Falcone J.L.
        • Claxton R.N.
        • Marshall G.T.
        Communication skills training in surgical residency: a needs assessment and metacognition analysis of a difficult conversation objective structured clinical examination.
        J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 309-315
        • Gigon F.
        • Merlani P.
        • Ricou B.
        Advance directives and communication skills of prehospital physicians involved in the care of cardiovascular patients.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec 11; : 94https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002112
        • Gigon F.
        • Merlani P.
        • Ricou B.
        Swiss physicians’ perspectives on advance directives in elective cardiovascular surgery.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2015; 81: 1061-1069
        • Hadler R.A.
        • Neuman M.D.
        • Raper S.
        • Fleisher L.A.
        Advance directives and operating: room for improvement?.
        A a Case Rep. 2016; 6: 204-207
        • National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death
        Knowing the risk.
        A review of the peri-operative care of surgical patients. 2013 (London)
        • ICM Research
        How to have a good death: general public survey.
        Endemol for BBC, London2006
        • Thorevska N.
        • Tilluckdharry L.
        • Tickoo S.
        • Havasi A.
        • Amoateng-Adjepong Y.
        • Manthous C.A.
        Patients’ understanding of advance directives and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        J Crit Care. 2005; 20: 26-34
        • Bravo G.
        • Dubois M.
        Advance directives for health care and research.
        Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2003; 17: 215-222
        • Schwarze M.L.
        • Bradley C.T.
        • Brasel K.J.
        Surgical ‘buy-in’: the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy.
        Crit Care Med. 2010; 38: 843-848
        • Redmann A.J.
        • Brasel K.J.
        • Alexander C.G.
        • Schwarze M.L.
        Use of advance directives for high-risk operations.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 418-423
      1. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland. Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) decisions in the perioperative period. Membership of the working party, London, 2009.

        • Brown J.
        How clinical communication has become a core part of medical education in the UK.
        Med Educ. 2008; 42: 271-278
        • Maguire P.
        • Roe P.
        • Goldberg D.
        • Jones S.
        • Hyde C.
        • O'Dowd T.
        The value of feedback in teaching interviewing skills to medical students.
        Psychol Med. 1978; 8: 695-704
        • Brighton L.J.
        • Koffman J.
        • Hawkins A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of end-of-life care communication skills training for generalist palliative care providers: research quality and reporting guidance.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 54: 417-425
        • Vindrola-Padros C.
        • Mertnoff R.
        • Lasmarias C.
        • Gómez-Batiste X.
        Palliative care education in Latin America: a systematic review of training programs for healthcare professionals.
        Palliat Support Care. 2017; 16: 107-117
      2. 101st Congress. Patient self-determination Act. Washington D.C. Public law number 101-508. Statute Number: 143 1990.

        • Musa I.
        • Seymour J.
        • Narayanasamy M.J.
        • Wada T.
        • Conroy S.
        A survey of older peoples’ attitudes towards advance care planning.
        Age Ageing. 2015; 44: 371-376